Last week I wrote about what makes a story a story and why an instance, a dramatic moment, is not story—and I dug into all those juicy ingredients of story.
But what if you aren't writing a big, plot-driven book? What if your project is more character-driven, more moody perhaps, or more interested in language than the tried and true mechanics of storytelling?
What if indeed! This is such a great question, and it applies to the more artful, less linear memoirs, too.
Here's my theory: Literary works (the books that are less heavy on plot) follow the conventions of storytelling, too. They have the same ingredients as plot-driven narratives, but they might be mixed in a different order (the story arc may be inverted, for example) and these key elements of story are often more subtle.
I think of it this way: Your character's desire, the obstacles to that desire, and all these other story elements are like knobs on a stereo, and you can turn them up and down (bass, treble, volume, etc.) based on the effect you are trying to achieve.
❓ Would it be valuable to you to look at a book together and assess how the author uses storytelling technique? Reply with a book you'd like us to examine. The book should be one that you admire—one that you regularly recommend to others.
For some, storytelling is second nature and for others, storytelling requires practice. If you fall into that second camp, know that there is no shame in this whatsoever! By studying a story told well, you'll be able to recognize the elements of good story in your own work—and where you may need to turn up the storytelling dials, so to speak.
Plus, it'll be fun. So tell me: What book do you love? Let's get out a scalpel and see how it's made.